Can Romney Get Tuff on Energy and Fed. Spending?

Justice Dakota

04/05/2012

In addition to President Obama's failed "Green Energy" solar meltdown (solar energy companies Solyndra and Solar Trust of America may have cost tax-payers around 2.5 billion before they filed for bankruptcy), President Obama may have also pissed-off the Canadians who have an energy advantage over the U.S. (never thought that would ever be said, by anyone).

If a picture (video and/or graph) is worth a 1,000 words ... then Romney can easily defeat President Obama if he can communicate to the American people the grossness of the following:

1) Obama's Failed Energy Plan:

Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper recently explained that President Obama's rejection of the Keystone oil pipeline had forever changed Canada's paradigm with respect to energy markets.

"Look, the very fact that a 'no' could even be said underscores to our country that we must diversify our energy export markets," Harper stated.

Harper indicated the damage can not be undone!

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/04/03/canada-after-keystone-wed-rather-sell-oil-to-china

2) Obama's Federal Spending & Wasteful Spending is Out of Control:

Martha Johnson, who led the General Services Administration (GSA), which manages the federal government's property, resigned from the Obama Administration in April, 2012, after reports of inappropriate spending at a conference near Las Vegas.

Reportedly, the GSA administrator insisted its 2010 Western Region's Conference be, "over the top, bigger and better than in years past."

The cost for "training" around 300 federal employees was $832,000.

http://nation.foxnews.com/general-services-administration/2012/04/05/american-idle-croons-about-being-under-inspector-generals-investigation

3) The National Debt will Cause National Poverty:

The National Debt Clock (Live!)"

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

$73,000 Debt Per American under Obama Budget Plan!

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/73000-debt-american-under-obamas-budget-plan_635499.html

Here is Obama accusing Bush of being unpatriotic because of his $4 trillion in deficit-spending over eight years (Obama has subsequently added $5 trillion in debt in about four years):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zUPZJDBJI84

Because I know how complicated macro-, and micro-economics can be, let me simply say: when a nation's interest payment on its debt is greater than what it spends on other major federal program(s) -- the other programs will have less funding in the future.

By now we should all know that paying interest on your credit card does not reduce the debt and means you have less money for future financial needs.

The U.S. government most likely will spend more in 2019 to pay the interest on the national debt than it will spend on its military and/or some of its most favored, institutionalized social programs:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obamas-budget-interest-payments-will-exceed-defense-budget-2019_635445.html